I'm too into the World Cup to blog. I have zero inspiration to write anything about anything. Keeping up with the games are long stretches of boredom and laziness followed by moments of sheer joy and terror. I'll be back if/when USA goes home...

I'm going to attempt the life experiment of... doing the exact opposite of what I would normally do. I don't mean a strawberry margarita instead of a coconut. Or Sarah Palin over a rock in a box.

I mean real life choices.

This should go great.

I will take a coconut margarita though.

Ok -- I just want to dedicate one small post to reclaim my blog's prohibitions in blogworld. I've had this blog for about two months now. Since I am an adoptee, when I signed up, adoption-related issues are what I sought to write about at least some of the time and will continue to.

I will never moderate comments (unless I attract a real wayward fruit from the crazy train) because this is the internet, it's not supposed to be moderated and I'm not afraid of someone else with an opinion. After all, there are plenty of self-righteous crazies who have discovered the perks of blogging while buying children in bulk from third world countries at the same time.

But I just want to clarify because I've been getting some very annoying and not-very-original posts and personal emails from biased readers regarding my, so far, very brief posts about my views of my life as an adoptee and the whole business in general. These posts/emails are coming from people whom are not adopted themselves, but have adopted brothers, sisters, cousins, ex-girlfriends, dogs and neighbors.

I'm all for debate, in fact, I go looking for argumentative debate, it's a personal hobby of mine. But I prefer to argue with people who can form, you know, an actual thought in their head; a thought that's based on fact, research and maybe even personal experience if we're lucky.

So just a heads up to pro-adoption readers -- please, do continue to read my blog, I'd be very happy to hear your opinions and exactly how you formed those opinions... but if you base my life on what you know of your own adopted child's or your friend's aunt's daughter's adopted child, I'll have to kindly rip you a new one.

I will always be in love with Al Pacino.

Growing up as the only adopted member of a predominantly Irish family, my unquestionable Italian-American heritage was more than obvious; my dad used to tell me my face resembled a young, female Al Pacino. Most girls would find this insulting, but I loved it. I'm weird like that.

While the President is addressing the economy and employment growth today, the religious zealot voters conservative voters are having child's play regarding President Obama's "cancellation" of the National Day of Prayer ceremony. Of course, as always, they are lost in that confusing corn maze of big words and punctuation.

Not that it should matter at all, but, his administration did not cancel the actual National Day of Prayer, or the freaking pancake breakfast that accompanies it (which takes place at the beginning of the year); he cancelled the ceremony.

The ceremony did not become "tradition" until a certain other cowboy was in Office... Ronald Reagan. It is a ceremony that usually includes a "pastor" or "reverend" (hence the evangelical/baptist crowd it targets) and the President would speak in a fashion resembling a State of the Union address. President Obama did attend the 'prayer breakfast' at the beginning of the year.

But his choice of attending the breakfast and even leading the room in prayer afterward, or personally contributing to the very Christian-oriented ceremony commemorating the Virginia miners last month, is just not pleasing to the neo-cons... They may say "it's not enough", but it will never be enough for them. This particular breed of voters will continue to fight this administration even after it is finished. Many of them would sacrifice their first-born to bring the Founding Fathers back from their graves. But I don't think they'd be pleased with the rulings of them.

Conservatives, to quote Bill Maher, seem to place the Founding Fathers on the same level as Jesus' apostles, think of them all as the Rat Pack. But again, the intellectual capacity of these people becomes obvious when their painted picture of the Founding Fathers does not match up with... the actual ideals of the Founding Fathers.

Everyone Those who read know the timeless quotes made by the F.F. dudes. Benjamin Franklin said, "A lighthouse is more useful than a church"; Thomas Jefferson said, "Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shown on man", James Madison wrote, "The fruits of Christianity are pride, indolence, ignorance and arrogance in the clergy".

The Founding Fathers were free masons (oh, and slave owners as well). The scary part is, if you confronted many conservatives with these facts, the crazy half would say Obama made these quotes appear, and the other crazy half would weave some type of dead end explanation into their hypothesis.

The whole conservative cultural war in this country is being passed off as a political war. It's not a political war; if it were politically-based it would require thought and rationalism, their war is based on prejudice, status-quo and their own interpretations of a 2,000+ year-old text. This is why religious leaders become politicians. Conservatives have no solid ground. Solid ground implies hard facts, and knowledge of those facts, their form of argumentation is constant falling, grabbing branches that aren't even there.

You can laugh at the antics or shrug it off, but what makes it real and not-so-funny is how much influence it has on our nation. Politics apply to everyone.

I find the confession below hilarious. PostSecret (<-- click and indulge); it's one of the best things since the invention of zippers or sliced bread. The entire project paints the perfect picture of what human nature really is, without all those bullshit "customs" and "manners"; and keeps it short and sweet...